Page 5 of 5

Re: 2010 MARDAVE RULES AT HRCCC

Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2009 2:13 pm
by DazLee
Sorry to jump in again but you all say the 'Must have reverse' rule eliminates top end speedos............Well, just to spoil the party..... The GM Genius to my knowledge(Arguably the most powerful / quickest and best speedo of them all) has the option of reverse.

Sorry guys!

Thanks
Daz

Re: 2010 MARDAVE RULES AT HRCCC

Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2009 9:00 pm
by Dale
If someone wanted to compete in the champs and was using this to gain a noticable advantage then we would ay something.

Regards Dale

Re: 2010 MARDAVE RULES AT HRCCC

Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2009 10:19 pm
by dogpinkscot
nice one ddddddale

Re: 2010 MARDAVE RULES AT HRCCC

Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2009 10:20 pm
by dogpinkscot
daz im sober now and the gm speedo looks like its made of stickle bricks ha ha ha :wink:

Re: 2010 MARDAVE RULES AT HRCCC

Posted: Fri Dec 18, 2009 2:55 am
by DazLee
It may look like it was made from stickle bricks by.........well, YOU!!!!!
But, the performance you can't argue with!

Re: 2010 MARDAVE RULES AT HRCCC

Posted: Fri Dec 18, 2009 12:20 pm
by Wacker1
Doubt the GM Genius Speed Control will make any Performance difference anyway, with a 1s 3.7v Lipo Pack!

If someone has £220 spare for a GM Speedo, then maybe there looking into the WRONG Class.........Touring may well be more suited to them! Thats what its specifically Designed for! :oops:

Lets just look forward to a Close Competitive 2010 Season for the Standard Mardave Class, which should hopefully bring back the Racers, due to the NEW Improvements to the Rules! :D 8)

Re: 2010 MARDAVE RULES AT HRCCC

Posted: Fri Dec 18, 2009 10:25 pm
by dogpinkscot
its a stickle brick with a usb connection ha ha ha :D :D

Re: 2010 MARDAVE RULES AT HRCCC

Posted: Fri Dec 18, 2009 11:12 pm
by Richie
I guess, any speedo designed for 2 cell lipo 10.5 which is running at 13.5 on a single cell, must be operating something like 25% of its capacity, at this rate I think it might be difficult to spot any difference, I think the proposal is fine, racing will show differences, but I'm not expecting the variation to be any near as large as using a G2 on 4 cells.

I think we all should except change is in the making here, which will inevitable require a small amount of tweeking, probably in the brushed classification to match the 13.5t. I think this thread shows the interest is still there, we just need to forge ahead.