Page 2 of 6

Re: Supporting existing classes

Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2009 11:48 pm
by Richie
Gazza

You anything to do with politics, if not then your wasted. :twisted:

Re: Supporting existing classes

Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2009 11:48 pm
by stox217
Gosh for a simple car its caused way to much troble i might just stick with brushed standerd v12! simple but fun!
And run 13.5 in a different heat this will be modifyed mardave's and keep the two apart!

Re: Supporting existing classes

Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 12:10 am
by Gazza
Yea richard you could say that LOL :roll:

Been on committee's on model car clubs most of my life . . .
so I know exatly what happens and its so funny as the mardave has come round again been here so many times its unreal and the result is always the same . . . . FOLDS

remember in life to K.I.S.S. . . .Keep It Simple Stupid But alas the younger generation seem to know better I remember Months ago to K.I.S.S this topic with Standard and Brushless class only then it was to be called modified and now it wants to be called the GT class :roll: So Yea I find it very funny and LMAO at the comments that fly around I can only advise people not put into force the do's and dont's

We have now found out that the Mardave Brushless Goes like a bullit

And infact the power/ speed / torque needs to be turned down so it handles good enough NOW Craig and James fit wider rear tyres on instead and still loose out so they not learning to well are they . . .
if it wont go around a corner at that speed then you need to slow down not go faster with bigger tyres you crash out take someone elase out and still loose whats the point hence the F4 class

Any way I'm running this Saturday with full AFTERBURNER so dont stand to close to my rear :lol: :lol:


Image

Re: Supporting existing classes

Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 12:14 am
by stox217
The question gazza is Is it brushed or brushless?? :lol: :lol:

Re: Supporting existing classes

Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 12:20 am
by Gazza
Hell no. . . Nick
I 'm not in to kids battery stuff when it comes to planes

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=1IXQVh5IbHc

Turn ya sound up and Listen to them engines roar 8) 8) 8)

Re: Supporting existing classes

Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 12:25 am
by stox217
hehe cool
But dont you melt my body shell when your flying low! :D
(urmm driver's on the rostrum duck gazza'z clipped the corner and has took off over) :lol:

Re: Supporting existing classes

Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 12:27 am
by Wacker1
Well, if Craig Races his V12 with the 'Sensorless' Mardave Brushless System again, this Saturday, I'll run my Mardave with my 'Sensored' Speedo/10.5T Motor as an experiment...........if the 10.5T ends up being faster(which is doubtful), we can then eliminate this from the Debate...............if it ends up being equal to the Mardave System, then I propose we should consider/have the following(sensible)Rules for a Mardave 'GT' Class :

1000g Weight
Std V12 Suspension Front & Rear
Aluminium or Carbon Fibre Chassis
Fixed Axle or Diff
Std Width Wheels & Tyres
ABS or Lexan Bodyshell(No 12th Pan Car Shells)
Any Brushless Speedo(as long as it has Reverse)
Mardave 'Sensorless' Brushless Motor or 'Sensored' 10.5T Motor

Unless anyone disagrees?

Re: Supporting existing classes

Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 12:29 am
by stox217
Its a shame i can not make it saturday if i could i would race my brushless system too just to try it :)

Re: Supporting existing classes

Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 12:31 am
by Gazza
Dean in a word. . . Nailed it . . . .

On hang on . . . . . and 27t and 19t and. . . . . . . . . . . . :twisted: . .LMAO

Re: Supporting existing classes

Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 12:33 am
by stox217
Post removed :oops:

Re: Supporting existing classes

Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 12:38 am
by Gazza
Ditto :D

Re: Supporting existing classes

Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 12:39 am
by stox217
Something i shouldent be :lol:

Re: Supporting existing classes

Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 12:39 am
by Gazza
CORRECT

Re: Supporting existing classes

Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 12:40 am
by stox217
:P lol so thats staying as it is ie g2 motor's?

Re: Supporting existing classes

Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 12:42 am
by Gazza
Basically out the box mardave g1. . g2 forward reverse blah blah some where on this forum will have a look 4 ya



MARDAVE STD CLASS(BRUSHED ONLY)

1 1000g Weight Limit
2 mardave suspension and mardave wheels
3 Std Aluminium Mardave V12 Chassis
4 G1/G2/NEW G2 Motor
5 Any ABS or Lexan Bodyshell by Mardave or Kamtec(No 12th Pan Car Shells)
6 Any Forward & Reverse Speed Controller
7 solid axle or Diff
8 Standard width tyres
Basically what most people run now